Wednesday, May 30, 2007

BlogHer Thursday: If You Could Only Wear ONE Thing . . .

I think the word you are looking for is "hott"

I have found myself wondering, this week, what I would wear if I could only choose one thing--one garment or one outfit or one look--for an entire year. In some ways, it seems so simple--after all, I wear virtually the exact same jewelry every single day, which is an outfit in itself. But what trips me up is the knowledge that while I am not a slave to clothes or fashion, I use my wardrobe to create a persona, and at this point in my life, I am feeling like a lot of different people (wife, mother, daughter, writer, blogger . . . ). To choose one outfit that encapsulates all of that is hard.

Then again, perhaps the point of Martin's project is that we should NOT use our clothes to illustrate the deeper parts of our soul. Perhaps the point is that in choosing not to change our outer appearance every day, we can find our inner self more easily.


Read the rest here.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Independent Confirmation That I Am Not Making (All Of) This Stuff Up

Should you wear flip-flops to work? I say no--and so does the Wall Street Journal.

Whether your workplace has a formal dress code or not, leave your flip-flops for lazing around at home or going to the gym. It's easy to regard your most glorified flip-flops -- such as the ultra-trendy $350 jeweled thong sandals now showcased in the most fashionable boutiques -- as office-worthy. But when it comes to flip-flops, there's a thin line between hip and unkempt.


Agreed.

Now, have you told us about your underwear? Come on, it's no fun unless everyone shares!

Thanks to Busy Mom for the tip!

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Tell Me About Your Underwear (Seriously)

We're moving on Friday and while I am VERY excited and VERY in love with our new house, I am a LITTLE wigged out by all the STUFF we have in our current house and by just how many BOXES it's taking to get it all ready to roll.

Of course, my shoes are packed, in their own individual sterlite boxes, because I luuuuurve them. Just don't tell them that they will be sharing a closet with my husband's shoes, because that might upset them and we wouldn't want that. Shhh.

all mine

Anyway! Because I have to go toss some more crap into a box, I'm going to ask YOU to do my job for me. Again. Because you're so GOOD at it.

Here's what I need: Stacy wants some lingerie advice.

I totally agree with the not showing my undies rule, but seem to have a hard time following it. I am a bigger girl (size 12-14) and don't always feel comfortable in low cut panties. What are your everyday panty style suggestions (with brandnames)?


Frankly, I'm curious too, because Hanes has discontinued my favorite low-rise briefs and now I have a drawer full of undies that aren't QUITE doing it for me. So tell us what kind of undies YOU are wearing: brand and fit (low rise, high rise, boy cut, whatever) and, if possible, where you shop for them.

And I haven't forgotten about pants. I swear I'm getting to the pants. Really. Soon. Right after I finish packing. But let's get the underwear out of the way first, shall we?

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Monday, May 28, 2007

Welcome To Summer!

I found you some shoes. Aren't they pretty?

espadrilles
Sophia Espadrille, Payless Shoes, on sale for $19.99

You're welcome!

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Friday, May 25, 2007

I Ask, You Answer (Better Than I Ever Could, Frankly)

Hi Susan,

I was going to leave this in a comment, but I am an over-sharer, so here's an email...

I didn't find you a denim skirt (admitting that I didn't look very hard), but I think that this one is pretty cute.

swiss dot skirt
Swiss dot skirt, JC Penney, $24.99

I wear a size 22 and I am six feet tall, so I have always had a struggle finding clothes. Especially pants. I have had very good luck shopping (online!) at JC Penney, Chadwicks of Boston, Jessica London (also carries some pants in plus size tall), Lands End (they will hem your pants to the inseam you request, up to 34 inches) and Talbots. Where I pick stuff up all depends on what I need. The quality at Chadwicks and Jessica London are pretty poor, but for something I don't expect to wear alot or last more than one season, they work. Sometimes I shop at Lane Bryant (the brick and mortar store, not the catalog store) but the clothes there are a little too trendy for me. I am a pretty preppy, classic dresser and I have had good luck finding pieces which fit that style, especially at Land's End and Talbots, (as long as I step away from some of their pleated, more "old lady" items! Ack!). I buy almost all my suits from Talbots (but only on sale. They have great sales. Online!) or from the Jones New York outlet near my home. Also, I should note that Penney's has a good selection of plus size maternity clothes (a huge challenge), which are not too expensive. Lane Bryant (www.lanebryant.com) did not come out with their maternity line until after I delivered, so I have no experience with those clothes. If you have the money to drop, Dana Buchman has beautiful plus size dress clothes. They are not cheap. Also, the Elisabeth line, by Liz Claiborne, is a good choice for work clothes.

I am so glad that you are looking into this because I believe that it is important for average sized people (and designers) to realize, as you do, that just because a person is overweight, or in a plus size, it doesn't mean that they are not interested in fashion and dressing well. I get a little bit frustrated with some of the quality of the clothing that is available these days, but I think that is an issue for all sizes.

Thanks again, Susan. I love Friday Style because I love clothes, shoes and fashion. Especially shoes.

Kate


I e-mailed Kate back and said THAT'S NOT OVER SHARING, THAT IS THE ANSWER TO A PRAYER! She also pointed out something that I had not thought about, but that bears sharing here: "I noticed that Ann Taylor now goes to an 18 (which must look positively gigantic compared to the size 00) but I would venture to guess that those clothes are still cut very slim, and might not fit someone who was a very curvy 18. And, an 18W size is different from a straight up 18, which is what I think Ann Taylor is carrying."

I love the Internet. You all are smart and funny and kind, and you come through for a girl when she needs it most.

Tomorrow: two questions about pants.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Dear Plus-Sized Clothing Manufacturers,

Stop using regular sized models on your web sites. Seriously. I know that a size ten seems HUGE in the world of super models, but give me a break. If you're going to market to women who wear a size 14 or larger, let's see the clothes on someone who wears a size 14. Or larger!

Also: please PLEASE stop telling women that if they wear a size fourteen (or larger!) they must settle for skirts down to their ankles and jumpers that look like potato sacks gone wrong. Or worse, PANTS WITH PLEATS. Even Kate Moss looks gigantic in pants with pleats, and she hasn't eaten since the late 80s. Wearing a size 14 (or larger!) shouldn't doom a girl to dressing like an escaped member of a religious cult. And it shouldn't mean that all she can buy is a tent with armholes. Or pants with pleats, for god's sake.

jumper
Lane Bryant, $17.99

I'm not asking for much. I'm looking for an A-line denim skirt, in a nice dark wash, that will hit an average height woman just below the knee. I'm looking for a one-button jacket that falls to the hip and doesn't have pockets all over the front or some crazy ass floral print on it. I'm looking for dresses that have actual WAIST LINES. In size fourteen. OR LARGER!

But mostly I'm wondering why, when the average American woman is 5'4" and weighs approximately 160 pounds, you are not making more of an effort to sell them clothes. Great clothes, fashionable clothes, clothes that FIT them and FLATTER them. Not jumpers and pants with pleats.

That's all. But if you know where I can find that denim skirt, I would appreciate it.

~Susan

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Reinventing the Heel

For years I have tried to wear heels, without any real success. I'm just not a heels kind of girl, I guess; I walk too fast, I'm a little bit pigeon toed, and I have bunions. I watch women who can chase down a toddler in stilettos and I am a wee bit envious. I like the look of heels, that very chic and sleek and sexy edge; I like how a simple heel can dress up any outfit and make everyone's legs look long and lean. But I hate how much my feet hurt after a day in heels, and how awkward I feel when I'm trying to do what I need to do while balancing on a heel.

So I've decided that I'm not going to mess with the heels any more; I am going to be that girl who always wears cool ballet flats.

new shooooes
Acacia by Yellow Box. Available at Zappos, in cheetah and black. But really, get the cheetah. Because CHEETAH, you all!

Today I'm starting a new writing gig; the wonderful people at Work It, Mom! have invited me to be their fashion blogger. On Tuesdays and Fridays, I'll be at the Working Closet telling you what to wear to work and beyond! And of course, on Mondays and Thursdays you can find me at BlogHer, talking about how to dress the body you have RIGHT NOW. As always, I will be advocating for shopping your closet first and the mall later, and buying pieces that will last past this one season. And, of COURSE, I will be insisting that your underwear never show and that you not even THINK about going to work in flip flops.

And I will still be here, answering your questions and directing you to the good, the bad, and the baffling, and waxing philosophic about why it's so hard to find grown up clothes these days.

And I'll be wearing my cheetah flats for all of it.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Sunday, May 20, 2007

Some Figure Tips and A Fat Rant

First, some business: for the next few weeks, I will be writing a series of posts at BlogHer focusing on strategies for dressing specific figures. The posts will run on Mondays and Thursdays; this Thursday, I will start with the "apple" shape (thin arms and legs, heavier through the mid-section). I'll look at what to wear and where to shop.

Want to see your body type addressed? Send me a an e-mail (fridaystyle.susan AT gmail DOT com) and tell me 1)what your body is like, and 2)what you have the hardest time shopping for.

Next, some thought-provoking entertainment: Joy Nash is a 26 year old actress and activist; she is also the author of Fat Rant, which has had over 700,000 hits since debuting on YouTube. In Fat Rant, Nash talks, with humor and honesty, about being fat. She insists that fat is a descriptive term; it is not synonymous with stupid or lazy or mean. She challenges fat people to stop waiting to get thin and start living. She also dares us all to own up to the number on the scale, because it's just a number; it's not a marker of who you are.

Fat Rant is inspiring and energizing. I think Joy Nash is my new hero.


Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Fit Matters: Cathy Horyn on Dressing The Grown-Up Body

Today's New York Times is carrying a piece by fashion critic Cathy Horyn about the dearth of interesting fashion for women over 40.

So what changed? Juvenility has mobbed us. Even if a woman has a clear idea about what looks right on her body and for her age and personality, it’s hard to avoid the window displays of baby-doll and trapeze dresses; the T-shirt bars of ruffled cotton, airbrushed cotton and shrunken cotton; the girlish necklaces and charms; and all the companion editorial in magazines, with the frosted pinks and the long, long hair with little curls.


I really like Horyn, for several reasons. Most recently, she was banned from the Armani and Dolce and Gabbana fashion shows because she doesn't fawn over every new collection, choosing instead to call a spade a spade; frankly, I find this refreshing. I'm tired of hearing fashion writers ooh and aah over every single thing that comes down the runway, regardless of how it will translate to actual women's closets (and sometimes in spite of the fact that it just WON'T).

OLDER_chloeblue.190
Chloé silk trapeze dress, $1,790.00

But I also admire Cathy Horyn because she's not, in many ways, someone you would imagine to be a powerful fashion writer. She fell into fashion writing when she was a young mother, taking a job for which even she admits she was essentially unqualified, and turning it into a powerhouse career.

But it was this 2005 essay in the New York Times that completely won me over. In it, Horyn talks about her career as a fashion writer; in particular, what it has meant to be a plus-size woman in a field where, as she puts it, "some of the most enjoyable moments at a show occur before the models come out, when the editors are sizing up one another's appearance: a new hairdo or a clear failure to refuse the extra helping at lunch." At the time she wrote the essay, Horyn had recently lost over thirty pounds and was, for the first time in her career, able to wear the clothes she had been writing about. The essay, though, is less about fitting than it is about fitting in, and about how many ways there are to do just that.

I like Horyn's perspective on fashion because it feels more pragmatic to me than that of other fashion writers (although designers see this as a kind of mean-spiritedness, but whatever). Today's piece in the Times is, for the most part, dead on, although Horyn still focuses on high-end designers rather than affordable every day wear. Her theory is sound, though--those of of Of A Certain Age (which really is anywhere from 40 to 70) don't want to look like girls; we want to look like women. And we want clothes that fit our not-forever-21 bodies.

It's a step in the right direction, and Horyn's piece is entirely worth reading.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Outerwear for Eveningwear

Susan,

Finding the perfect "something" to wear over a nice sundress or evening dress has always been a challenge for me. I typically wear a cardigan, but it tends to feel too office-like when I'm at an event like a wedding. I've tried a shawl or wrap, but I find I spend most of the day/evening adjusting it. I have a summer wedding coming up, and I am wearing a strapless sundress, but cannot decide on a cover-up to wear with it for this conservative wedding.

Any thoughts? If you need a reference, the dress I bought is a summery peachy/rose colored dress from Banana Republic with cream colored accents. I tried to find the link online, but it looks like they sold out already.

Thanks for your help!

Cara


Cara is right; her everyday cardigan isn't what she wants over her beautiful BR dress. Even a beautiful beaded cardigan will make the dress seem more utilitarian and less dressed up. Likewise a shrug (one of those wee little sweaters that only cover your shoulders) is too casual, and a jacket is too businesslike. For a wedding, opt for something more dressy and feminine, and yes, perhaps even a little bit impractical. Because you really can make it work, for just that one day.

So what could Cara wear? She has two options, really: a lightweight wrap or a light evening coat.

ep75_carrie_tangled_dogs
Sara Jessica Parker's own coat, Sex and the City, Season 6

I love this coat; it's just beautiful. It's also vintage, so not readily available. But the evening coat is a wonderful piece to own, and is more versatile than you might think, particularly if you are someone who goes to a lot of after-five functions. Choose a coat in a functional color (perhaps black or, in Cara's case, ivory) or in a print that will go with other pieces in your wardrobe. An evening coat can be worn over a dress or with jeans, for a funky dressy look. The hem should hit either just above or just below the knee, mimicking the hem of a short dress, but it could be as long as the mid-calf. It is fine, though, to wear a shorter evening coat over a longer (or even full-length) dress or skirt. The coat is outerwear and does not need to match what goes under it, but it does need to work with your dress or gown, rather than against it. It should be dressy, like your dress, for example, and more feminine than your everyday coat (not something tailored). Look for details like an empire waist and bracelet-length sleeves, or a fuller skirt. Parker's coat balances a busy, girly print with a simple, clean line.

The down side of an evening coat, of course, is that it is a coat, and in the summer, that may be too much. Cara's best bet, I think, is going to be a wrap, and yes I did hear her say that she feels like she spends the evening fussing with shawls, but hear me out.

Cara wants to look for a wrap that is not slippery--in other words, she does NOT want a silk or chiffon wrap. Instead, she wants to look for something with a little bit of weight--say, a pashmina/silk blend. This will keep the shawl from sliding all over the place. She wants a wrap that is long enough to drape comfortably over her shoulders but not so long that it hangs past the hem of her dress when she does this. She wants to choose a color that compliments her dress but doesn't distract from it.

I would suggest that Cara wear the shawl for the wedding ceremony, which is typically the most solemn part of any wedding, and take it off for the reception. She can keep it handy in case the weather cools off but I would say go with the beautiful dress, on its own, for the party. Her dress sounds beautiful, and this is a party, after all, not a meeting, so strapless is fine. Cara will OF COURSE have the right bra on with her dress, and will stand up straight and tall, so she shouldn't need any extra coverage.

Cara should also take a look at Anne Metz's video, for suggestions on how to tie a long shawl to create a hands-free shrug (ideal for managing a shawl and a drink or hors d'oeuvres).

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Scarves: A Primer

Susan,

I love scarves. I buy them as gifts for my friends all the time.
They can really fancy up a simple outfit.
But, what I lack is the skill to tie them without it looking like a tourniquet.

Thank you for your continued thoughts and advice,
Poptart


Poptart, I like your use of "fancy up." I thought we only said that in Oklahoma.

I also love scarves; in the winter, I wear a long scarf over a sweater quite a lot of the time, and in the summer, a beautiful silk scarf can do wonders to dress up a basic tee. And I'm all about dressing up the basic tee.

VNU_HermesScarf_1c_75
Hermes scarf. Of course.

The best primer I've found for tying a scarf is this video by Anne Metz, from StyleDash; Anne gives tips on tying a long silk scarf, a traditional muffler, and a large shawl-like scarf. It's very helpful to see what she's doing. She leaves out two of my favorite ways of wearing a scarf, though. The first is to take a longer scarf (either a lightweight shawl or a long silk scarf) and wrap it around your neck two or three times; before you tie it, thread one part of it up through the part you just wrapped (does that make sense?). Or, finally, try this: take a large square scarf, fold it in half, so it's a triangle, and drape it around your neck; tie it in a knot and pull a mackintosh or jacket on over it. This look works best if you're going to keep the coat or jacket on, but it's a good way to add interest to your raincoat (I'm wearing mine ALL THE TIME these days, so I've been thinking about that a lot).

Finally, don't forget that you can tie your scarf to your bag, for a splash of color. I have a beautiful silk scarf that a very dear friend gave me; it's pink and orange, with leopard trim and pictures of eighteenth century chairs on it. Yes, really! I tie it to the handle of my tote bag because I love it--it's bright and fun and reminds me of someone I wish I saw every day instead of every five years--but it's hard to wear with actual clothes.

So here's a question for you--would this post benefit from a photo essay? Or video? Because I could totally do that, I think. Let me know.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Monday, May 14, 2007

Making Disposable Fashion Work for You

In the comments on this post, several of you pointed out that disposable fashion has its place in the basics wardrobe; in particular, you mentioned tank tops, which are not meant, at any price, to last indefinitely, and which can be an easy way to upgrade classic investment pieces.

tanks
Jockey tank from Bare Necessities, $10.00

Agreed.

So how do you work the disposable tank into your investment wardrobe? Answer is here. And while you're getting your tank tops ready for summer, don't forget to head over to Mrs. Chicken's and read about how to wear shorts.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Forever 21: The Future of Fashion?

Into the ongoing discussion about where to shop in between the college dorm and the retirement home comes this: today's New York Times is profiling Forever 21, the new home and cheap and chic style. I've not been in a Forever 21 store, because I live in Oklahoma City, which is not exactly a fashion mecca, but I am both intrigued and unnerved by the Times' assessment that they are "relentlessly chasing trends and catering to an ever-widening market — young women and matrons, men and toddlers."

Hmmm. Somehow I don't see myself in any of those categories.

I am also put off by the whole "fast fashion" culture of disposable clothes; it goes against everything I believe in and advocate (invest in classic pieces with staying power). But I often feel like I am a lone voice in a wilderness of cheaply made knock-off dresses and tees, crying out about the value of good fabrics and quality construction.

What's your take on Forever 21? Or on H&M, which is their largest competitor? Or on the "fast fashion" culture in general? Is this the wave of the future? Or is the future here now and do I need to get with the program?

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

When Retro Is More Than Just A Look

I went to the grocery this morning (because even fashionistas have to eat, or at least feed their children, who apparently are tired of pasta EVERY SINGLE NIGHT for some reason) and because my grocery of choice is a SuperTarget, I decided to do a little market research (I'm looking for an inexpensive sundress to toss on after the pool).

What I found instead was this:

long halter dress
Mossimo Supply Co. for Target, $21.99

The full-length sundress is back for Summer 2007, and I find myself less interested in the actual trend than I am in the logic behind it, particularly in light of the ongoing conversation we've been having here about where exactly one shops if one is old enough to drink legally but not yet eligible to collect Social Security.

The last time the full-length sundress was hott was in the 70s, when I (and many of you, let's face it) were kids. My mother most likely had a dress like the ones I saw at Target today, or perhaps like the ones J. Crew is showing just now, which seem a little more her style. In fact, quite a number of things that were big in the 70s are coming back into fashion, and I think this has less to do with fashion being cyclical or with designers running out of ideas (really, was this EVER a good idea?) than it does with a kind of nostalgic longing for the past. Or, more specifically, with the kind of painful identity crisis many women my age seem to be having just now.

I've been talking to a lot of women lately about what it means to be nearing 40, about how our lives are--or at least seem to be--different from our mothers' lives at this same moment in time. We talk about how the cultural expectations of us as women and wives and employees and mothers has changed, how now every choice we make is dissected and critiqued and found wanting, and how the stress of all that is wearing on us. The other night I had dinner with some incredibly smart and funny friends, all of whom, in one way or another, are feeling the strain of being women. One friend has been diagnosed with fibromyalgia and was listing for us all the medications she takes, none of which, she says, really work. Another friend has lost perhaps fifteen pounds recently, and while she looks great, we all fretted a bit about how little she is. A third friend recently moved and was telling us that she has been yelling at her kids more lately, and that she feels guilty about that. A fourth friend changed jobs not too long ago and is still coming to terms with her longer work hours and with the fact that she has hired a nanny to cover for her during the week. We all laughed about how much more we drink these days, more, say, than we did in the years between college and children, even though those really SHOULD have been the last of our big party years, without mortgages or private school tuitions or retirement savings to worry about.

In this context, I find the return of the full-length sundress fascinating. It's not a practical piece of clothing, if you think about it; it's the kind of thing you would wear to host a party, not to chase the kids at the park or go to the office or run errands on the weekend. The long sundress requires that you sit or stand peacefully with a drink in your hand and just relax. I think, for a lot of us, that's how we remember our mothers, although I suspect that our mothers would laugh at that. I think the resurgence of clothing from our childhood is a play on our constant fears about adulthood and our deep desire to return to a time when our biggest worry was getting our homework done in time to go out and play before dinner.

I won't be buying a long sundress this summer, both because that's not my style and because I want to move ahead, away from all this angst and fear. But I do want to keep thinking about what fashion says about us as women, and why designers and manufacturers are insisting that we dress like children, or like our mothers did thirty years ago, instead of acknowledging all the roles we play in our daily lives and providing attractive, comfortable, affordable clothes to dress for it.

In lieu of the long sundress, how about some long shorts? I'm over at Mrs. Chicken's today, dishing about how to wear shorts this summer. Helpful hint: no one wants to see your underwear! But you all ready knew that, didn't you?

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

That's a Wrap

I'm over at BlogHer today, talking about wrap dresses. And lusting after this one, in particular:

DVF wrap dress
Diane Von Furstenberg wrap dress, $325.00

Isn't that hott?

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Monday, May 07, 2007

Gap Incorporated, You Are On My List

Recently, I've started to feel like I am too old to shop at Old Navy, which is sad because they have typically been an excellent source of basics like tees and pants (I'm wearing a pair of ON khaki chinos and a long ribbed tank top right now, in fact, with a shirt from J. Crew). But any more, when I go into the stores (seldom) or look at the web site (more often) I feel old and out of place, although I was having a difficult time putting my finger on exactly why that was so.

Until today, when Sheri sent me the link to this:

Dear Old Navy,
Terry cloth romper, $19.50. Available in four colors, although I don't know why it matters.

"I just want to know who," Sheri asked, "I mean WHO aside from a 7-year old girl, can wear this?" Answer: NO ONE. And I'm even hesitant about okaying it for a seven-year-old.

Between the closing of Fourth & Towne and this monstrosity, I am really not feeling any extra love for the Gap these days. NONE. At all.

Which is sad, because these chinos I'm wearing are the bomb.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Thursday, May 03, 2007

A Word From The Men About Cleavage

I've said it before, but there is really only one unbreakable fashion rule: Do NOT Show Us Your Underwear. Usually, I am talking about your panties, but there are some related rules that we should all review.

Today, Roger had the following helpful suggestion:

Okay, someone really ought to write this up to let moms know this:

What seems like a perfectly modest, not-at-all-tight blouse or dress, with just a hint of cleavage, can quickly turn into a show 'em all to the dads at the play area when you bend over to deal with your toddler or preschooler. Many times I've been at the play area at the mall when some mom, obviously trying to look more like a mom than a MILF, bends over to talk to their kids and everyone comes out to play, if you know what I mean. Mind you, I'm not complaining--quite the opposite, in fact--I just thought some of those moms might like to know.

Of course, some of them may already know, and that's okay too. Welikes that, we does.


Roger brings up a good point: mom or not, please, check ALL your views when you're putting together an outfit, and think about what you will be doing while you're wearing it. Stand up, sit down, bend over, reach up--is everything where it should be? If not, is that okay with you?

Keep in mind, though, that people are always looking. That's all.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

What To Wear To A Wedding (Five Weeks After Giving Birth)

wrap nursing dress

Dear Susan,

My sister-in-law is getting married in mid-October. The wedding will be held on a cruise ship and the overall vibe will be fairly casual. (I'd probably call it semi-formal, and I KNOW no one will be wearing tuxedos.) This is a second wedding for my sister-in-law, and a fairly small affair.

Now, here's my problem. At the time of the wedding I will be 5 WEEKS POSTPARTUM. I have NO IDEA what I am going to wear. I am not a member of the wedding party, but as a member of the "immediate" family I want to look good. I know I'm still going to have a belly pooch. Should I wear a ... sigh... maternity dress? I don't think I can get a dress in my pre-pregnant size, so what size? What type of style would flatter my jiggly belly and big nursing breasts? (Also a style
that would be nursing-friendly would be extremely helpful!) I'd like to try to stay under about $150 for the dress. Is there any help or advice you could offer? I am at a loss.

Thank you so much.
Rebecca
Congratulations, Rebecca! I love babies. And weddings!

Answer is here.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Martini, Anyone? How About 80?

This is the best thing I've read all day:
HAVE I told you about my 80-martini lunch?

I exaggerate. Actually, four of us shared 80 martinis, so it was really a 20-martini lunch.

Frankly, once you get past the first 12 martinis, it might as well be 80. But it was worth it.

I think I have a little crush on Eric Asimov. Which almost makes up for this:

J. Crew, what the hell were you thinking?
Talitha patchwork dress from J. Crew, $495.00

No, on second thought, NOTHING makes up for that. Not even the eighty martini lunch.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt

Frivolous Find

Today I am in love with this dress, despite the fact that it is too short and too expensive.

dress
LaROC "Spring Fling" smock dress, $258.00

Because it will go so perfectly with my black pedicure.

Continue reading . . .
add to sk*rt